DOI:10.12301/spxb202600426
中图分类号:TS201.4
陆柏益, 刘轩卓, 王章铁
| 【作者机构】 | 浙江大学生物系统工程与食品科学学院; 浙江大学杭州国际科创中心 |
| 【分 类 号】 | TS201.4 |
| 【基 金】 | 浙江省尖兵科技计划项目(2025C01100)。 |
青年视点:老年营养与适老功能食品研究
编者按:伴随全球人口老龄化加快与健康衰老需求的持续提升,老年人群精准营养干预与适老功能食品研究已成为食品营养与老年健康交叉领域的研究热点。本期栏目聚焦代谢性炎症早期干预与老年术后营养支持两大方向,系统解析食源性活性成分的营养调控机制,探讨适老功能食品与功能配料的研究与转化路径,旨在为老年精准营养干预体系构建与适老食品产业创新发展提供科学参考。
(栏目策划: 张逸群)
全球人口老龄化正在以前所未有的速度推进。预计到2050年,全球老年人口规模将持续快速增长[1]。老龄化在延长人均寿命的同时,也显著增加了慢性非传染性疾病的负担。健康衰老,即在整个生命周期中避免或延缓慢性疾病的发生,已成为全球公共卫生的核心目标[2]。
近年来,慢性低度炎症被认为是连接衰老进程与多种衰老相关疾病的重要病理基础[3]。其中,由营养过剩、脂质代谢紊乱和胰岛素抵抗等代谢应激驱动的炎症状态被称为代谢性炎症[4]。不同于急性炎症,其通常表现为肿瘤坏死因子α(tumor necrosis factor-alpha, TNF-α)、白细胞介素1β(interleukin-1 beta, IL-1β)和C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein, CRP)等促炎标志物水平轻度但持续升高[3]。代谢性炎症可视为营养和代谢因素失衡驱动的慢性炎症,无明显临床症状,却能通过激活TLR4/NF-κB通路[4]、活化NLRP3炎症小体[5]、增加氧化应激[6]、诱导线粒体功能障碍[3]及加剧营养感应异常等途径,长期损害组织功能,驱动动脉粥样硬化、胰岛素抵抗及神经退行性病变,最终导致心血管疾病、2型糖尿病、代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病以及阿尔茨海默病等衰老相关性疾病。
传统临床管理聚焦衰老相关疾病确诊后的疾病终末期,此时组织损伤往往已不可逆[7]。而采用早期营养干预,将干预窗口前移至无症状的代谢性炎症阶段,具有更广阔的应用前景[7]。研究表明,膳食等环境因素在调控老年人群代谢性炎症中发挥关键作用[7-8]。大规模队列研究表明,地中海饮食、DASH饮食(dietary approaches to stop hypertension,得舒饮食)等优质膳食模式,可有效降低机体炎症水平[8-9]。然而,目前研究仍存在不足:机制研究多集中于疾病治疗阶段,针对早期预防的探索不足[10];人体临床证据相对缺乏,尤其是老年人群[11];对特定营养素在不同状态下的作用差异认识不清[12-13];以及多组学研究结果难以转化为适老食品功能配料的创制依据与应用策略,是该领域从基础研究走向产业转化的重要瓶颈。
本文围绕老年代谢性炎症的发生特点与评价方法,重点介绍早期营养干预的作用机制及典型食物成分的老年人群循证依据,并进一步讨论适老食品功能配料的靶向筛选、稳态化与递送、适老化应用及评价,旨在为面向健康衰老的精准营养干预研究和适老功能食品产业的高质量发展提供参考。
老年代谢性炎症是免疫系统重塑,机体慢性低度炎症水平升高与免疫应答能力减弱共同作用的结果。核心特征体现在4个方面:一是老年阶段的低度炎症更易维持和迁延[14];二是机体对营养和代谢负荷适应能力降低,使餐后代谢扰动更易伴随持续的炎症应答[15];三是老年代谢性炎症还具有明显的多系统性和个体差异性[16];四是老年代谢性炎症通常呈低幅度、长期性和动态演变的特点,并可早于临床疾病发生[17]。
准确评价老年代谢性炎症是开展早期营养干预的前提。传统研究常使用CRP、IL-6、TNF-α等炎症指标,能够直观反映系统性炎症负荷水平[10]。但是,单一炎症因子难以全面反映老年代谢性炎症的复杂性[18]。
为弥补传统方法的不足,研究者发展了多种互补的评价技术(表1[19-29])。
表1 老年代谢性炎症多维度评价技术
Tab.1 Multidimensional assessment techniques for metabolic inflammation in older adults
评价方法代表性指标或技术主要优势主要局限参考文献膳食炎症指数评价DII、CHINA-DII可利用膳食调查资料量化饮食的炎症潜力,适用于人群比较;CHI-NA-DII进一步考虑了我国膳食结构特点评价的是膳食炎症暴露而非机体实际炎症水平;结果依赖膳食调查准确性及可获得的食物参数,不能替代循环炎症标志物检测[19-21]多组学评价非靶向代谢组学、脂质组学、IgG Fc N-糖组学及多组学特征组合可同时表征多条代谢和免疫通路,揭示炎症表型异质性,并筛选候选组合标志物结果受检测平台、样本前处理和分析流程影响;高维数据分析复杂,候选标志物组合仍需独立验证和标准化[22-23]新型生物标志物WSTF表达及其核自噬信号、CXCL9与慢性炎症及免疫衰老机制联系较紧密,可辅助区分部分慢性与急性炎症表型,并提示潜在炎症驱动因子WSTF证据仍主要来自机制研究和特定疾病样本;CXCL9在现有研究中主要作为iAge模型的贡献因子,尚不能据此作为通用的独立临床诊断指标[24-25]影像学评价结构磁共振成像、脑体积、皮质厚度、SPARE-BA及脑年龄差值可提供器官和空间层面的结构表型,将外周炎症与脑老化、脑萎缩及脑韧性联系起来现有证据主要为观察性关联,结果可能受到脑血管病和代谢状态影响;单独使用难以确定因果关系或全身炎症来源[26-27]人工智能与机器学习评价机器学习脑年龄、AI-Risk、LightGBM/SHAP蛋白质组衰老时钟、随机森林特征筛选可整合临床、炎症、组学、生活方式和影像数据,识别非线性关系及关键特征,形成个体化的生物衰老或疾病风险指标模型性能依赖数据质量、样本代表性和预处理流程;数据异质性、模型解释性、外部及纵向验证是临床转化的主要限制[25,28-29]
膳食炎症指数(dietary inflammatory index, DII)是基于文献衍生的评分系统,可量化个体饮食相关的炎症暴露[19]。较高的DII评分与CRP升高显著相关[20]。中国膳食炎症指数(China dietary inflammatory index, CHINA-DII)考虑了中西方膳食结构的差异,保留了27种膳食成分,临床样本显示,该指数与hs-CRP呈正相关(r=0.20,P≤0.001),高CHINA-DII评分个体出现hs-CRP≥3 mg/L的可能性是低评分个体的1.90倍[21]。多组学技术可把炎症与营养、肠道微生物、脂质重塑和能量代谢异常关联起来,为老年代谢综合征的深度表型和未来临床转化提供了依据[22-23]。
此外,新型生物标志物[24-25]、影像学与人工智能技术[25-29]可从分子机制、器官结构与多源数据整合层面补充评价维度,更好地支持老年代谢性炎症的早期识别和精准营养干预。
老年代谢性炎症是长期膳食暴露与衰老相关代谢弹性下降共同作用的结果。随着年龄增长,机体对餐后葡萄糖、脂质等营养底物的处置能力减弱,代谢恢复时间延长;同时,老年人肌量减少、肠屏障完整性受损、线粒体功能下降及免疫调节失衡等,会进一步削弱机体对营养负荷的缓冲能力和炎症消退能力。反复或过度的餐后营养应激更易累积为持续性低度炎症反应,推动代谢异常与炎症激活相互促进[30]。基于此,早期营养干预应从5个层面展开(图1)。
图1 老年代谢性炎症的早期营养干预机制
Fig.1 Mechanisms of early nutritional intervention for metabolic inflammation in older adults
消化吸收决定营养底物进入循环的速度和持续时间。老年人餐后底物清除减慢,表现为葡萄糖动力学受抑和餐后甘油三酯暴露增加,在同等高糖或高脂膳食负荷下,老年人更易形成持续的高糖、高脂代谢暴露[31]。葡萄糖快速入血可增加活性氧(reactive oxygen species, ROS)和非酶糖化,促进晚期糖基化终末产物(advanced glycation end products, AGEs)累积,并经晚期糖基化终末产物受体(receptor for advanced glycation end products, RAGE)放大NF-κB信号[32]。因此,老年人早期营养干预过程可通过研发能保留完整食物基质、增加黏性或可发酵膳食纤维、限制游离糖及超加工比例的适老食品,来延缓胃排空和淀粉水解,削平餐后葡萄糖-胰岛素峰值,从源头减少ROS、AGEs-RAGE及NLRP3/NF-κB信号通路相关的营养过载。
人群干预研究为消化吸收过程干预提供了多层面的证据。花青素随高脂高能量餐摄入,可改善超重老年人餐后大血管及微血管反应,并降低4 h的CRP水平[33];健康老年人随机交叉试验显示,乳清蛋白/瓜尔胶餐前预负荷可降低葡萄糖负荷后的血糖和3-O-甲基葡萄糖反应,其作用主要与延缓小肠葡萄糖吸收和促进胰岛素分泌有关[34]。抗性淀粉补充研究也显示,每天补充30 g抗性淀粉可改善70岁以上老年人的血糖、胰岛素和稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗指数(homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, HOMA-IR)[35]。膳食加工水平方面,一项纳入36名社区老年人的随机交叉受控膳食干预试验,将受试者日常习惯膳食中约50%能量来自超加工食品的模式,替换为仅约13%能量来自超加工食品且符合膳食指南的低超加工膳食,干预持续8周。结果显示,降低超加工食品比例可降低能量摄入,使体重和脂肪量下降,并改善HOMA-IR、胰岛素、C肽、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C)、载脂蛋白B和CRP水平;同时下调瘦素表达、上调成纤维细胞生长因子21表达,表明在老年人中降低超加工食品比例并提高整体膳食质量,可通过能量摄入和营养感知网络减轻老年人的代谢炎症负荷[36]。肠道层面,可将可发酵膳食纤维与n-3多不饱和脂肪酸(n-3 polyunsatura-ted fatty acids, n-3 PUFAs)或益生菌联合应用,老年低度炎症人群补充后,血清戊酸和IL-10水平升高[37];在50~75岁人群中,可溶性玉米纤维联合鱼油可改变肠道菌群β多样性及肠上皮转录网络[38]。消化吸收过程干预可通过保留食物基质、延缓糖脂底物吸收、降低超加工食品比例、增加可发酵底物和优化n-3 PUFAs供给等多环节,协同降低老年人餐后糖脂代谢负荷,并改善与低度炎症相关的肠道微生态和营养感知网络。
肠道菌群将膳食底物转化为短链脂肪酸(short-chain fatty acids, SCFAs)、吲哚类等活性信号,是膳食调控老年代谢性炎症的核心靶点[39]。衰老和虚弱主要改变菌群功能,不同队列中菌属变化虽有差异,但功能层面的共性在于可发酵底物利用能力和屏障支持能力下降[39],导致结肠上皮能量不足、紧密连接松解,脂多糖(lipopolysaccharide, LPS)易位后经TLR4/NF-κB和NLRP3通路将肠源性刺激传递至肝脏、脂肪和骨骼肌[40]。因此,早期干预应定向调节“底物-代谢物-屏障-组织代谢”链条,而非仅增加某一菌属。
临床研究为此提供了多维证据。MaPLE试验显示,富多酚膳食可增加瘤胃球菌科(Ruminococcaceae)并降低血清连蛋白水平,表明多酚经菌群代谢可改善肠道屏障功能[41-42]。该效应与菌群代谢物吲哚-3-丙酸升高耦联,而多酚的变化又与CRP降低显著相关,说明屏障修复与全身炎症缓解同步发生[42]。老年代谢综合征人群的研究发现,较低的膳食炎症指数与更高的菌群多样性及更稳定的粪便代谢网络相关,进一步支持膳食-菌群-炎症轴的存在[43]。短期高剂量燕麦干预可提高丁酸、降低连蛋白,且两者变化与菌群位移直接相关,表明可发酵纤维对屏障功能的即时影响[44]。菌株干预方面,含植物乳杆菌(L. plantarum)PBS067、嗜酸乳杆菌(L. acidophilus)PBS066和罗伊氏粘液乳杆菌(L. reuteri)PBS072的合生元,在老年代谢综合征患者中连续服用60 d可显著改善胰岛素敏感性和血脂谱[45];而益生菌对卡塔菌属(Catabacter)、伯克霍尔德菌属(Burkholderia)、脂多糖结合蛋白及单核/树突细胞的调节存在性别差异性,提示干预时需考虑个体因素[46]。此外,在年龄为63岁及以上且基线阿克曼菌丰度较低的亚组中,巴氏灭活嗜黏蛋白阿克曼菌(A. muciniphila)MucT可提高肝胰岛素敏感性和餐后胰高血糖素样肽1反应,说明后生元亦可通过特定菌株依赖通路发挥效应[47]。据此,用于调节食物与肠道菌群的适老食品应优先选择能产生明确功能代谢物并同步维护肠屏障与组织代谢稳态的组合,并依据代谢通量、通透性和菌群丰度进行动态评估。
营养素吸收后进入细胞代谢网络,参与氧化磷酸化、谷胱甘肽循环和脂质氧化等反应。衰老使线粒体质量控制减弱,过量葡萄糖和脂肪酸更易引起ROS积累、脂质过氧化和蛋白糖化,进而形成代谢损伤与炎症相互放大的恶性循环。
针对特定生化瓶颈的营养补充可能有助于恢复细胞稳态,但其作用具有明显的靶点依赖性。烟酰胺核糖可扩增老年男性骨骼肌NAD+代谢组,并诱导抗炎转录特征,但未显著改善骨骼肌线粒体生物能学和整体代谢功能[48]。甘氨酸和N-乙酰半胱氨酸(N-acetylcysteine, NAC)联合补充,为谷胱甘肽合成提供底物,在老年人中可改善谷胱甘肽不足、氧化应激、线粒体功能、炎症状态及胰岛素抵抗[49]。尿石素A作为肠道菌群来源的食物代谢物,可改善部分肌肉耐力,并降低与线粒体代谢和炎症相关的血浆标志物,但对6 min步行距离和最大ATP生成能力的改善未达到显著水平[50]。硒与辅酶Q10联合补充可提高低硒老年人的血清游离巯基水平,从而改善全身氧化还原状态[51]。因此,此类干预不宜作为泛化的“抗衰老补充”,而应基于缺乏状态、氧化还原失衡或线粒体代谢障碍等具体问题进行精准干预。
营养应激可经模式识别和氧化还原通路转化为炎症输出。LPS、氧化脂质及损伤相关分子可激活TLR4/NF-κB,促进TNF-α和IL-6表达[52]。线粒体ROS和脂质沉积还可激活NLRP3炎症小体,促进IL-1β和IL-18成熟,加重老年低度炎症和功能衰退[5]。
不同营养干预对炎症信号通路的调节具有明显的细胞类型、组织部位和剂量依赖性。富橄榄油地中海膳食可调节高心血管风险老年人外周血单个核细胞(peripheral blood mononuclear cells, PBMCs)中CDKN2A、IFNG、NLRP3、PIK3CB和TGFB2等炎症及神经炎症相关基因表达[53]。燕麦酚酰胺可抑制绝经后女性单个核细胞NF-κB结合活性[54]。白藜芦醇在老年2型糖尿病患者中可提高沉默信息调节因子1水平并改善部分氧化应激指标[55]。在维生素D缺乏老年人中,高剂量维生素D单独干预或与NAC联用可下调PBMCs中p16表达并降低衰老相关β-半乳糖苷酶活性[56]。然而,单一营养素并不必然带来预期的信号通路改变。n-3 PUFAs联合抗阻训练虽可改善部分肌力指标,但未进一步增强抗阻训练对骨骼肌p65 NF-κB等炎症或分解代谢信号的调节作用[57];线粒体靶向抗氧化剂MitoQ虽降低老年人骨骼肌线粒体H2O2释放能力,却未改变运动后AMPK、p38 MAPK或ERK1/2磷酸化及相关基因应答[58];萝卜硫素在老年人PBMCs离体处理条件下可增强核因子E2相关因子2(nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2, Nrf2)及其下游抗氧化基因表达,但该结果无法直接外推为口服干预效果[59]。
部分营养素可进入细胞膜和肌肉组织,影响炎症消退、底物利用和组织修复能力。二十碳五烯酸(eicosapentaenoic acid, EPA)和二十二碳六烯酸(docosahexaenoic acid, DHA)进入膜磷脂后,可改变花生四烯酸底物池,并为消退素和保护素等促消退介质提供前体[60]。动物研究显示,老龄骨骼肌存在促消退脂质介质合成不足,补充消退素D1(resolvin D1, RvD1)可降低炎症因子表达、限制纤维化并改善损伤后肌力恢复,但其对免疫细胞浸润和肌纤维再生的作用有限[61]。n-3 PUFAs可增强老年骨骼肌对氨基酸和胰岛素的合成反应[62],长期补充还可能增加健康老年人的肌肉量和力量[63]。在肌少症老年人中,亮氨酸强化乳清蛋白联合维生素D可减缓IL-6随时间升高的趋势,但并非直接降低IL-6水平[64]。蛋白质、维生素D和β-羟基-β-甲基丁酸(beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, HMB)强化补充可降低营养不良肌少症老年人的铁蛋白和骨桥蛋白[65],而在营养状况良好的老年人中,亮氨酸强化蛋白单独或联合n-3 PUFAs干预并未进一步改善肌量、肌力、身体功能或肌蛋白合成率,表明其效应受基线营养状态和肌肉合成阻力影响[66]。上述部分营养素干预可补足细胞功能物质,阻断氧化损伤向代谢性炎症转化。
不同食物成分对老年代谢性炎症的调控效应差异显著,其作用强度、作用机制各不相同。为便于系统比较与整体把握,本文分别讨论各类食物成分在老年代谢性炎症调控中的作用特点及其作为适老食品功能配料的应用依据。表2汇总了典型膳食成分对老年代谢性炎症调控的人群证据[37,64,67-88]。
表2 典型食物成分对老年代谢性炎症的调控效应
Tab.2 Regulatory effects of typical food components on metabolic inflammation in older adults
成分类别代表成分人群样本量/人干预剂量/周期研究结果推测核心机制参考文献膳食碳水化合物菊粉+抗性糊精均龄约60.5岁老年2型糖尿病患者(DBPC-RCT)99菊粉+抗性糊精合计6.3g/d;12周空腹/餐后2h血糖分别下降0.96/1.47mmol/L;胰岛素抵抗指数下降0.65二者经菌群发酵生成SC-FAs,激活FFAR2/3,增强紧密连接与肠屏障,并改善胰岛素信号[67-68]总膳食纤维/谷物纤维≥65岁社区老年人(PCS)4125总膳食纤维每天增加5g;队列观察每天增加5g与CRP降低0.05 SD、IL-1RA降低0.04 SD相关;谷物纤维与较低炎症的关联最一致生成SCFAs,激活FFAR2/3并促进Treg分化,同时强化肠屏障、减少LPS入血[69-70]燕麦β-葡聚糖/小麦阿拉伯木聚糖≥65岁社区老年人(P-RCT)49燕麦β-葡聚糖或小麦阿拉伯木聚糖12g/d;6周与麦芽糊精安慰剂相比,肠通透性、菌群组成及全身炎症均无显著组间差异经菌群发酵生成SCFAs,调节FFAR2/3、黏液层和紧密连接,维持肠屏障稳态[71]洋车前子壳纤维40~65岁超重/肥胖成人(RCT)162(ITT 158)7或14g/d;3个月意向性分析中,两剂量对CRP、IL-6、纤维蛋白原及白细胞计数均无显著影响;依从者中仅高剂量使纤维蛋白原小幅下降形成黏性凝胶以延缓营养吸收,并经部分发酵生成短链脂肪酸,调节肠屏障和免疫代谢[72]乳清蛋白+必需氨基酸+维生素D均龄80.3岁肌少症老年人(DBPC-RCT)130乳清蛋白22g、必需氨基酸10.9g(亮氨酸4g)、维生素D 100 IU/d;12周;两组均运动去脂体重增加1.7kg,握力、IGF-1和功能指标改善;CRP降低(P=0.038)亮氨酸-mTORC1促肌蛋白合成;维生素D-VDR抑制NF-κB,减少肌分解和炎症[73-74]膳食蛋白质/氨基酸亮氨酸强化乳清蛋白+维生素D≥65岁肌少症且活动受限老年人(DBPC-RCT)288每日2份:每份乳清蛋白20g、亮氨酸3g、维生素D 800 IU;13周IL-6时间×干预交互显著(P=0.046):对照组升高而干预组维持稳定;IL-8总体下降较高亮氨酸负荷强化mTORC1;维生素D-VDR/NF-κB协同维持炎症稳态[64,75]植物蛋白/动物蛋白年龄64±6岁2型糖尿病患者(RCT)37二者均占总能量30%;6周两组趋化素和颗粒蛋白前体下降,IL-6、TNF-α无显著变化调节脂肪因子、菌群-SC-FAs及氧化应激,影响趋化素/颗粒蛋白前体介导的免疫代谢[76-77]EPA+DHA均龄51.0岁超重、久坐的中老年人(DBPC-P-RCT)138EPA+DHA 1.25或2.5 g/d;4个月IL-6分别下降10%和12%,安慰剂组上升36%;2种剂量相对安慰剂均有改善置换膜磷脂中的花生四烯酸,并生成消退素、保护素和噬消素,抑制NF-κB并促进炎症消退[78-79]膳食脂质n-3 PU-FAs强化乳+维生素/微量元素63~80岁老年人(DBPC-CO-RCT)48强化乳250mL/d;每阶段12周,洗脱16周红细胞膜n-3指数及EPA、DHA升高;花生四烯酸、同型半胱氨酸和n-6/n-3比值降低n-3 PUFAs重塑膜脂并减少花生四烯酸底物,维生素和硒降低ROS,共同抑制NF-κB炎症信号[80-81]n-3 PU-FAs+多菌株益生菌65~80岁低度炎症社区老年人(DBPC-P-RCT)76n-3 PUFAs 640mg/d(EPA 300mg、DHA 220mg)+益生菌 1×1010 CFU/d;8周hs-CRP无组间差异;IL-10和粪便戊酸升高,n-6/n-3比值下降40.67%EPA/DHA生成促炎症消退介质;乳杆菌和双歧杆菌增强肠屏障与SCFAs信号,促进IL-10并抑制TLR4-NF-κB[37]
续表2
成分类别代表成分人群样本量/人干预剂量/周期研究结果推测核心机制参考文献植物化学素花青素60~80岁轻度认知障碍或心血管代谢异常人群(DBPC-RCT)99320mg/d;24周CRP、IL-6、IL-1β、LDL-C及综合炎症评分均优于安慰剂组(P=0.0001~0.037)激活Nrf2抗氧化反应,抑制TLR4-NF-κB/MAPK,减少ROS驱动的炎症因子转录[82-83]槲皮素均龄67岁冠心病搭桥患者(DBPC-P-RCT)97500mg/次、2次/d;术前2d至出院,术后最长7d总体hs-CRP在出院时呈下降趋势(P=0.073),术后第4天无组间差异;血管舒张改善主要见于男性清除ROS并调节PLAUR-PLAU-SERPINE1网络,减轻内皮衰老、炎症分泌表型和血管功能障碍[84]可可黄烷醇女性≥65岁、男性≥60岁(2×2析因设计;DB-PC-RCT)598500mg/d(含表儿茶素80mg/d);2年与安慰剂相比,hs-CRP年变化-8.4%(95% CI: -14.1%~-2.3%);IFN-γ年变化+6.8%改善氧化还原稳态和内皮功能,减轻与心血管代谢风险相关的慢性低度炎症负荷[85-86]植物甾醇68~92岁接受他汀治疗的养老机构老年人(SAIS)35植物甾醇强化发酵乳2g/d;6周LDL-C在第3周下降0.15mmol/L、第6周下降0.27mmol/L(均P<0.05);胆固醇吸收,标志物同步下降减少胆固醇进入十二指肠水相和混合胶束,并使餐源性胆固醇在乳糜微粒中的出现量降低[87-88]
碳水化合物的抗炎效应差异,主要体现在可消化速度、发酵特性及食物结构的完整性上。对美国老年队列的分析显示,总膳食纤维每日摄入量每增加5 g,CRP和白细胞介素1受体拮抗剂(interleukin-1 receptorCFU,菌落形成单位;CI,置信区间;CRP,C反应蛋白;DBPC-CO-RCT,双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉随机对照试验;DBPC-P-RCT,双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组随机对照试验;DBPC-RCT,双盲、安慰剂对照随机对照试验;DHA,二十二碳六烯酸;EPA,二十碳五烯酸;FFAR2/3,游离脂肪酸受体2/3;hs-CRP,高敏C反应蛋白;IFN-γ,干扰素γ;IGF-1,胰岛素样生长因子1;IL,白细胞介素;IL-1RA,白细胞介素1受体拮抗剂;ITT,意向性治疗分析;LDL-C,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇;LPS,脂多糖;MAPK,丝裂原活化蛋白激酶;mTORC1,哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白复合物1;NF-κB,核因子κB;Nrf2,核因子E2相关因子2;P-RCT,平行组随机对照试验;PCS,前瞻性队列研究;PUFA,多不饱和脂肪酸;ROS,活性氧;SAIS,单臂干预研究;SCFAs,短链脂肪酸;SD,标准差;TLR4,Toll样受体4;TNF-α,肿瘤坏死因子α;Treg,调节性T细胞;VDR,维生素D受体。
antagonist, IL-1RA)均呈小幅下降趋势,其中与谷物纤维的关联最为稳定[69]。然而,纤维的“抗炎推定”并不能一概而论。在针对老年人的随机试验中,燕麦β-葡聚糖或小麦阿拉伯木聚糖干预6周时,并未显著改善老年人肠通透性、菌群组成或全身炎症水平[71];洋车前子壳纤维对CRP、IL-6等指标的总体效应同样不显著[72]。这提示,适老配方不能仅依据膳食纤维总量来推定抗炎效应,还需细致区分其黏度、可发酵性、聚合度及个体耐受性。
菊粉、抗性糊精和抗性淀粉等可抵抗小肠消化,在结肠发酵产生SCFAs,进而影响肠屏障和免疫代谢。老年2型糖尿病患者连续12周摄入菊粉与抗性糊精强化奶粉后,空腹及餐后血糖和胰岛素抵抗指数均显著下降[67]。以老年人粪便开展的体外发酵研究还发现,菊粉与抗性糊精复配较单一菊粉产气更少,提示复配可能改善胃肠耐受性,但该结果尚不能替代人体临床验证[68]。此外,挤压麦麸虽可提高血清SCFAs,却未同步改善心理和生理功能相关结局[70],进一步说明发酵产物升高与临床获益并非同义。
需要指出的是,血糖生成指数(glycemic index, GI)无法全面表征膳食炎症调控效应是碳水化合物干预中的重要共识。GI主要反映血糖升高速度,但不能充分评价肝脏脂肪新生、肠道发酵、内毒素生成及食物基质效应[89]。例如,果糖属于低GI碳水来源[90],但大量摄入果糖仍可促进肝脏脂质合成、诱发内毒素血症[91-92]。相比之下,全谷物富含膳食纤维、抗氧化物和植物化学物,在部分随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial, RCT)中可降低炎症标志物[93];RCT荟萃分析显示,豆类摄入可降低CRP/hs-CRP水平,且该效应在特定亚组中更为显著[94]。因此,适老食品中碳水化合物设计应综合考虑糖类型、聚合度、糖苷键类型、加工方式及摄入时间。
老年人需足量优质蛋白以维持肌肉和免疫功能,但蛋白质的抗炎效应往往不能脱离整体干预组合来单独归因。肌少症老年人在运动基础上补充乳清蛋白、必需氨基酸和维生素D,不仅改善去脂体重和握力,CRP亦见下降[73];在PROVIDE研究中,亮氨酸强化乳清蛋白与维生素D干预使IL-6在13周内保持稳定,而对照组则升高[64]。但现有研究仅能佐证复合营养干预可缓冲肌少症相关低度炎症,却不能证明亮氨酸单独具有同等抗炎效应。亮氨酸长期补充虽可改善蛋白质合成[75],其剂量设计仍应结合总蛋白摄入、肾功能及活动水平综合考量。
老年蛋白质干预还需区分肌肉合成获益与炎症下降之间的因果关系。健康老年男性早餐补充维生素D和亮氨酸强化乳清饮品,可提高餐后肌蛋白合成效率[74],但该研究并未证实其对全身炎症的改善效应。对于肌少症患者,肌量恢复可减少失能和代谢负担,从而间接影响慢性炎症,但仍需以CRP、IL-6等直接指标加以验证。因此,适老高蛋白产品的评价终点应同时覆盖摄入量、肌肉功能、肾脏耐受性与炎症标志物。
蛋白质来源还会通过伴随营养素和菌群代谢影响炎症。在2型糖尿病患者中,植物蛋白和动物蛋白等高蛋白饮食均能降低趋化素和颗粒蛋白前体,但IL-6与TNF-α水平未显著改变,说明“植物蛋白必然抗炎、动物蛋白必然促炎”的二分法并不成立[76]。增加植物蛋白来源可改变心代谢高风险人群的菌群组成和色氨酸代谢[77],为“蛋白质来源-菌群代谢物-免疫调节”提供了人体依据,但其长期炎症结局仍需进一步验证。适老食品宜以乳、蛋、鱼和豆类构成多样化蛋白来源,控制加工红肉及其伴随的饱和脂肪、血红素铁和AGEs,同时避免将体外或动物研究中的活性肽机制直接等同于临床疗效。
对于老年人,过度低脂可能影响能量摄入、脂溶性维生素吸收及食品适口性,不利于老年代谢性炎症管理。因此,适老脂质营养干预的核心在于脂肪酸的替代关系,而非简单降低总脂肪。超重、久坐的中老年人补充EPA与DHA 4个月后,IL-6炎症水平较安慰剂明显下降[78];慢性炎症人群的交叉试验证实,EPA和DHA对单核细胞炎症反应及血浆促炎症消退介质产生不同影响,表明两者抗炎功能不能完全互换[79]。含n-3 PUFAs及维生素的强化乳可改善部分炎症衰老指标[80],但多成分配方难以将效应归因于某一活性成分。
较低剂量n-3 PUFAs与多菌株益生菌联用8周,并未显著改善老年人的主要终点hs-CRP水平,但IL-10、粪便戊酸水平和n-6/n-3比值出现有利变化[37]。值得关注的是,2型糖尿病患者补充n-3 PUFAs可上调Nrf2表达并改善抗氧化状态[81],为氧化应激与炎症联动提供了人体线索。适老脂质配方应优先以EPA、DHA和单不饱和脂肪酸替代反式脂肪与过量饱和脂肪,并明确实际剂量及氧化稳定性;对于合并抗凝治疗、吞咽障碍或能量摄入不足者,还需兼顾用药风险、产品质构和能量密度。
植物化学素主要通过调节氧化还原稳态、内皮功能和炎症信号发挥老年代谢性炎症调控作用,但其临床效应具有剂量、人群和性别特异性。轻度认知障碍或心血管代谢异常的中老年人补充花青素24周后,CRP、IL-6和IL-1β水平显著低于安慰剂组[82];花青素饮料还可影响外周淋巴细胞Nrf2通路及其下游基因转录[83]。槲皮素的抗炎效应在冠状动脉旁路移植患者中呈现性别异质性,血管功能获益主要见于男性,而整体人群hs-CRP水平仅呈轻微下降趋势[84]。
长期补充可可提取物可使老年人hs-CRP的年变化下降,但干扰素γ并未同向改善,显示单一抗炎评分可能掩盖不同免疫指标的分化反应[85]。针对外周动脉疾病患者的研究进一步显示,可可黄烷醇可在肌肉组织中诱导Nrf2通路相关变化[86]。植物甾醇作为另一类备受关注的膳食活性物质,其强化发酵乳可在接受他汀治疗的高龄人群中进一步降低LDL-C及胆固醇吸收标志物水平[87],其直接证据主要集中于降低LDL-C并抑制肠道胆固醇吸收,而非直接的抗炎作用。此外,对于植物甾醇等脂溶性成分,其降低胆固醇吸收的作用还会受到食品基质、添加形式及摄入方式等因素的影响,这些因素可能进一步影响活性成分的释放和吸收[88]。
适老食品功能配料创制需在功效证据与食品转化属性之间建立联系。针对老年代谢性炎症持续性、低度和多系统累及的特点[3],候选配料既应对应血脂与脂质吸收、肠道菌群与屏障调节、炎症信号及肌肉营养调控等关键环节,也需兼顾有效剂量、加工稳定性、生物可及性和食品基质适配性。因此,第3节中的活性食物成分并非均可直接转化为适老食品功能配料。
从功能基础和食品转化特征来看,可发酵膳食纤维和抗性淀粉可经肠道菌群发酵产生SCFAs,参与肠屏障和免疫稳态调节[95],具有较好的食品应用基础。可发酵膳食纤维和抗性淀粉类产品开发需兼顾功能剂量、产品质构和老年人群胃肠耐受性。膳食蛋白质、氨基酸及活性肽兼具营养补充和代谢调节价值,其中植物蛋白可满足老年人维持肌肉健康的营养需求[96];活性肽虽具有潜在生物活性,但其苦味、胃肠稳定性和吸收效率等问题仍制约其口服应用[97]。n-3 PUFAs可参与炎症相关脂质介质生成和细胞炎症信号调节[98-99],但其高度不饱和结构在产业应用中易受氧化稳定性及体系相容性的限制。植物多酚、植物甾醇等植物化学素结构和功能多样,但部分成分存在溶解性差、稳定性弱或生物利用度不足等缺点。因此,不同功能配料的开发重点并不相同,其中植物化学素更能体现活性成分由功能发现向结构优化、稳态化改良和食品应用转化的技术需求。
在植物化学素中,植物甾醇和黄酮类成分分别代表具有不同理化特征和转化需求的功能因子。植物甾醇可通过抑制肠道胆固醇吸收,降低LDL-C水平,其人体证据主要集中于血脂管理[100];特定植物甾醇有机酸酯在TNF-α诱导的细胞模型中表现出抗炎和改善线粒体相关功能的潜力[101]。竹叶黄酮具有清除自由基、抗炎、调节脂代谢等多重功能,可通过修复肠道屏障、抑制促炎细胞因子、重塑肠道菌群等方式改善老年个体的炎症状态[102-103]。此外,MaPLE随机交叉试验显示,富含多酚的膳食可降低肠通透性,升高老年人的血清和粪便钙卫蛋白水平,并使相关炎症和肠屏障标志物呈现协同变化[104],为多酚类功能配料在老年代谢性炎症干预中的应用提供了人群依据。因此,植物甾醇和竹叶黄酮既具有与代谢性炎症相关的功能基础,又分别面临脂溶性成分分散稳定性和多酚类成分稳定性差、生物利用度不足等转化问题,可作为后续稳态化改性、靶向递送及适老食品应用研究的代表性配料。
许多植物功能配料存在溶解性差、易氧化、消化释放不足等问题,这是限制其在适老食品中应用的重要原因[105-107]。据此,针对不同植物化学素的结构和稳定性特点进行稳态化与递送设计,是其由活性成分向适老食品功能配料转化的关键。
稳态化策略主要包括酯化改性、乳液递送、微胶囊化、纳米包埋、蛋白-多糖复合载体组装、环糊精包合和固体分散体系制备等[108]。植物甾醇可通过结构修饰改善油相或水相相容性,但改性后仍需验证其降胆固醇活性与安全性[109]。在O/W乳液中,乳清分离蛋白或大豆分离蛋白形成的界面膜可延缓植物甾醇光氧化[110]。植物甾醇与乳清分离蛋白可通过疏水作用和氢键形成自组装复合物;质量比为1∶5的甾醇/蛋白质复合物氢键作用最强、包封率最高,且其蛋白质二级结构与氢键强度共同影响活性成分的释放和生物可及性[111]。竹叶黄酮等黄酮类化合物则通过酶法酰化提升脂溶性与稳定性,如在Novozym 435催化下,于C6-OH位点引入芳香酰基,可提高脂溶性并增强其在油脂体系中抑制脂质过氧化的能力[112]。
递送体系设计需兼顾老年胃肠道在消化液分泌、胃排空、肠道运动及吸收功能等方面的变化[113]。例如,植物甾醇/乳清分离蛋白自组装复合物在体外模拟消化中的释放率为98.44%,高于游离植物甾醇的12.65%,说明蛋白载体具有提高生物可及性的潜力[111]。但在适老食品开发中,该结果不能替代人群证据,仅可用于优化适老食品配料的剂型、剂量和评价终点,从而将“稳定化-释放-吸收-功能效应”连成可检验的递送链条。
适老食品功能配料的应用不能仅取决于其体外活性,还应综合考虑食品基质适配性、加工稳定性、生物可及性、感官接受度和长期食用安全性。老年人常伴随咀嚼吞咽能力下降、胃肠耐受性降低、味觉敏感性改变和慢病共存等特点,因此功能配料应用于适老食品时,应兼顾营养密度、质构安全性、风味温和性、剂量合理性和慢病适宜性。
应用层面,植物化学素进入实际食品体系后,其利用程度不仅取决于活性成分添加量,还受到食品基质组成、加工方式及消化释放行为的共同影响。以姜黄素类为模型的研究显示,不同食品基质及纤维配方对其体外口服生物可及性的影响并不一致[114],表明植物化学素的适老化应用需要将配料特性与食品载体协同设计。具体而言,植物甾醇适合用于乳制品、植物基饮品和营养粉等体系,其功能定位宜聚焦辅助血脂管理;结构修饰可改善其体系相容性[109],蛋白复合可提高其体外消化释放效率[111]。竹叶黄酮与淀粉、魔芋葡甘聚糖复配并经动态高压微射流处理后,可改变复合体系的流变性、结构和体外消化特性,为低消化速率主食或代餐设计提供工艺依据[115];酰化改性则有助于拓展竹叶黄酮在油脂或乳化食品中的应用[112]。此外,普鲁兰酶辅助竹叶黄酮可改善山药粉的冲调性能并调节其体外消化行为[116]。除植物化学素外,膳食纤维、益生元和抗性淀粉可通过发酵产物参与肠屏障与免疫稳态调节,但产品评价应区分一般肠道健康效应与老年代谢性炎症终点[95]。n-3 PUFAs可用于心血管相关营养设计,但需同时控制氧化风险、能量密度及适用人群,其抗炎价值不能仅凭成分添加量推断[98]。
为此,适老食品功能配料的评价不能停留在成分含量检测层面,而应建立多维度评价体系。一方面,应检测功能配料在加工、贮藏和消化过程中的保留率、氧化产物、生物可及性和释放行为;另一方面,人群研究应预先界定主要终点,结合血脂、餐后血糖、CRP或IL-6等炎症指标、胃肠耐受性、膳食依从性和生活质量指标开展验证。总体而言,适老食品功能配料的转化路径应遵循靶向筛选、稳态递送、基质协同和适老评价的思路,核心目标不是简单提高活性成分添加量,而是在安全、稳定、可长期食用的基础上,检验真实食品体系对老年代谢性炎症的干预效果。
老年代谢性炎症是连接衰老进程与多种慢性疾病的关键病理基础,其本质是多器官代谢异常与免疫反应的持续交互,具有隐匿性、波动性和明显个体差异。早期营养干预将干预窗口前移至无症状的代谢性炎症阶段,可通过调控消化吸收、肠道菌群-膳食互作、细胞生化反应、炎症信号通路及细胞组成等多个层面,改善营养负荷应答、代谢稳态及炎症调节过程,为延缓代谢异常向慢性疾病进展提供潜在干预路径。
针对老年人群的循证研究表明,膳食纤维、抗性淀粉、蛋白质与氨基酸复合营养、n-3多不饱和脂肪酸以及植物甾醇、黄酮类等典型食物成分均可参与炎症与代谢调控,但其实际效应受到干预剂量、基线营养与代谢状态、食品基质及个体差异等因素影响,且部分干预对炎症终点的改善并不显著。因此,不能将机制层面的潜在作用直接等同于临床有效性,仍需以与目标人群和实际食品形态相匹配的人体研究作为功能评价的重要依据。适老食品功能配料的创制与应用也应由单纯追求高纯度、高添加量,转向靶向筛选、稳态递送、基质协同和适老评价相衔接的全链条研发,重点解决溶解性与稳定性不足、生物可及性受限、食品基质适配性差及感官接受度低等问题。
未来研究方向如图2所示。鉴于老年代谢性炎症具有慢性低度、多因素驱动和多靶点调控等特点,功能配料研发需进一步提高活性成分发现效率和功效评价的生理相关性。例如,未来可引入人工智能辅助天然产物研究,利用机器学习和深度学习处理复杂数据,用于候选成分筛选、成分分析及药理机制研究,从而提高早期发现效率;肠道类器官具有多种肠上皮细胞类型,可用于研究膳食营养素与肠道稳态的相互作用;器官芯片则可通过模拟动态微环境补充传统二维培养的不足,为肠道稳态和疾病过程研究提供更接近生理状态的模型。因此,未来应推动计算筛选、类器官或器官芯片验证、动物实验与人群研究之间的逐级验证体系,增强功能配料功效证据的可靠性和转化价值。
图2 适老食品功能配料的未来与展望
Fig.2 Future prospects of functional ingredients for age-friendly foods
在适老食品功能配料制备和产品转化方面,研究重点应由单纯追求活性成分得率转向绿色加工、活性保持与产品适配性的协同优化。超声辅助提取可用于酚类、黄酮等植物活性成分的提取,3D食品打印则为吞咽困难老年人的营养组成和质构定制提供了潜在路径,但均需进一步评价工艺标准化、加工稳定性、食用安全性和规模化可行性。同时,应把感官品质纳入功能配料的早期设计环节,针对多酚的苦涩味和部分生物活性肽的苦味,发展减苦、掩蔽、风味协同与老年人群感官评价方法,使产品不仅具有潜在功能,而且能够被长期接受和持续食用。
面向老年代谢性炎症的适老食品功能配料研究,应逐步形成“多维数智筛选评价-绿色加工与数字化制造-营养感官协同优化”的研发路径。同时加强剂量-效应关系、生物利用度、长期食用安全性及老年人群干预研究,使功能配料的发现、评价与食品应用形成更完整的证据链,推动适老功能食品由实验室研究向安全、有效且具有长期食用可行性的产品转化。
[1] Chen Q F, Ni C, Jiang Y L, et al. Global burden of disease and its risk factors for adults aged 70 and older across 204 countries and territories: a comprehensive analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021[J]. BMC Geriatrics, 2025, 25(1): 462.
[2] Rudnicka E, Napiera
a P, Podfigurna A, et al. The World Health Organization (WHO) approach to healthy ageing[J]. Maturitas, 2020, 139: 6-11.
[3] Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Parini P, et al. Inflamma-ging: a new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases[J]. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 2018, 14(10): 576-590.
[4] Hotamisligil G S. Inflammation, metaflammation and immunometabolic disorders[J]. Nature, 2017, 542(7640): 177-185.
[5] Youm Y H, Grant R W, McCabe L R, et al. Canonical Nlrp3 inflammasome links systemic low-grade inflammation to functional decline in aging[J]. Cell Metabolism, 2013, 18(4): 519-532.
[6] Olivares-Vicente M, Herranz-López M. The interplay between oxidative stress and lipid composition in obesity-induced inflammation: antioxidants as therapeutic agents in metabolic diseases[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2025, 26(17): 8544.
[7] Wang Z T, Yuan C Z, Huang T, et al. Early nutritional interventions for chronic low-grade inflammation[J]. Trends in Endocrinology &Metabolism, 2026, 37(2): 151-163.
[8] Wang P L, Song M Y, Eliassen A H, et al. Optimal die-tary patterns for prevention of chronic disease[J]. Nature Medicine, 2023, 29(3): 719-728.
[9] Sánchez-Rosales A I, Guadarrama-López A L, Gaona-Valle L S, et al. The effect of dietary patterns on inflammatory biomarkers in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(21): 4577.
[10] Tero-Vescan A,
tefănescu R, Pu
ca
A, et al. Inflammaging beyond biomarkers: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities[J]. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 2026, 48(6): 629.
[11] Wagenaar C A, van de Put M, Bisschops M, et al. The effect of dietary interventions on chronic inflammatory diseases in relation to the microbiome: a systematic review[J]. Nutrients, 2021, 13(9): 3208.
[12] Heymsfield S B, Shapses S A. Guidance on energy and macronutrients across the life span[J]. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2024, 390(14): 1299-1310.
[13] Stumpf F, Keller B, Gressies C, et al. Inflammation and nutrition: friend or foe [J]. Nutrients, 2023, 15(5): 1159.
[14] Alpert A, Pickman Y, Leipold M, et al. A clinically meaningful metric of immune age derived from high-dimensional longitudinal monitoring[J]. Nature Medicine, 2019, 25(3): 487-495.
[15] Keirns B H, Keirns N G, Sciarrillo C M, et al. Postprandial inflammation across the aging spectrum[J]. The Journal of Nutrition, Health &Aging, 2025, 29(3): 100468.
[16] Franck M, Tanner K T, Tennyson R L, et al. Nonuniversality of inflammaging across human populations[J]. Nature Aging, 2025, 5(8): 1471-1480.
[17] Wang T S, Zhang M R, Shi W X, et al. Atherogenic index of plasma, high sensitivity C-reactive protein and incident diabetes among middle-aged and elderly adults in China: a national cohort study[J]. Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2025, 24(1): 103.
[18] O’Connor M F, Bower J E, Cho H J, et al. To assess, to control, to exclude: Effects of biobehavioral factors on circulating inflammatory markers[J]. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2009, 23(7): 887-897.
[19] Shivappa N, Steck S E, Hurley T G, et al. Designing and developing a literature-derived, population-based dietary inflammatory index[J]. Public Health Nutrition, 2014, 17(8): 1689-1696.
[20] Mohammadi S, Hosseinikia M, Ghaffarian-Bahraman A, et al. Dietary inflammatory index and elevated serum C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Food Science &Nutrition, 2023, 11(10): 5786-5798.
[21] Chen Y H, Luo Z J, Cheng L, et al. Development and validation of the China dietary inflammatory index (CHINA-DII)[J]. Nutrients, 2025, 17(10): 1687.
[22] Comte B, Monnerie S, Brandolini-Bunlon M, et al. Multiplatform metabolomics for an integrative exploration of metabolic syndrome in older men[J]. eBioMedicine, 2021, 69: 103440.
[23] Krišti
J, Vu
kovi
F, Menni C, et al. Glycans are a novel biomarker of chronological and biological ages[J]. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2014, 69(7): 779-789.
[24] Wang Y, Eapen V V, Liang Y S, et al. WSTF nuclear autophagy regulates chronic but not acute inflammation[J]. Nature, 2025, 644(8077): 780-789.
[25] Sayed N, Huang Y X, Nguyen K, et al. An inflammatory aging clock (iAge) based on deep learning tracks multimorbidity, immunosenescence, frailty and cardiovascular aging[J]. Nature Aging, 2021, 1(7): 598-615.
[26] Gu Y A, Vorburger R, Scarmeas N, et al. Circulating inflammatory biomarkers in relation to brain structural measurements in a non-demented elderly population[J]. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2017, 65: 150-160.
[27] Marseglia A, Dartora C, Samuelsson J, et al. Biological brain age and resilience in cognitively unimpaired 70-year-old individuals[J]. Alzheimer’s &Dementia, 2025, 21(2): e14435.
[28] Theodorakis N, Feretzakis G, Tzelves L, et al. Integrating machine learning with multi-omics technologies in geroscience: towards personalized medicine[J]. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2024, 14(9): 931.
[29] Dunk M M, Huang H, Wang J, et al. The association between a pro-inflammatory diet and brain age in middle-aged and older adults[J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2026, 41(1): 39-50.
[30] Furman D, Campisi J, Verdin E, et al. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span[J]. Nature Medicine, 2019, 25(12): 1822-1832.
[31] Curl C C, Leija R G, Arevalo J A, et al. Altered glucose kinetics occurs with aging: a new outlook on metabolic flexibility[J]. American Journal of Physiology Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2024, 327(2): E217-E228.
[32] Portero-Otin M, de la Maza M P, Uribarri J. Dietary advanced glycation end products: their role in the insulin resistance of aging[J]. Cells, 2023, 12(13): 1684.
[33] do Rosario V A, Chang C, Spencer J, et al. Anthocyanins attenuate vascular and inflammatory responses to a high fat high energy meal challenge in overweight older adults: a cross-over, randomized, double-blind clinical trial[J]. Clinical Nutrition, 2021, 40(3): 879-889.
[34] Pham H, Holen I S, Phillips L K, et al. The effects of a whey protein and guar gum-containing preload on gastric emptying, glycaemia, small intestinal absorption and blood pressure in healthy older subjects[J]. Nutrients, 2019, 11(11): 2666.
[35] Alfa M J, Strang D, Tappia P S, et al. A randomized placebo controlled clinical trial to determine the impact of digestion resistant starch MSPrebiotic® on glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance in elderly and mid-age adults[J]. Frontiers in Medicine, 2017, 4: 260.
[36] Vaezi S, Freeling J L, de Vargas B O, et al. Impacts of minimally-processed omnivorous vs lacto-ovo-vegetarian diets on insulin sensitivity, lipid profile, and adiposity in older adults: secondary findings from a randomized crossover feeding trial[J]. Clinical Nutrition, 2025, 55: 90-103.
[37] Tingö L N, Hutchinson A N, Bergh C, et al. Potential modulation of inflammation by probiotic and omega-3 supplementation in elderly with chronic low-grade inflammation: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(19): 3998.
[38] Moosavi D, Mullens D A, Davidson L A, et al. Gut microbial community and host intestinal gene expression with combined fish oil and soluble corn fiber compared with corn oil and maltodextrin: a randomized crossover trial in healthy older individuals[J]. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2025, 122(2): 396-412.
[39] Bradley E, Haran J. The human gut microbiome and aging[J]. Gut Microbes, 2024, 16(1): 2359677.
[40] Xiao Y, Feng Y X, Zhao J X, et al. Achieving healthy aging through gut microbiota-directed dietary intervention: focusing on microbial biomarkers and host mechanisms[J]. Journal of Advanced Research, 2025, 68: 179-200.
[41] Del Bo C, Bernardi S, Cherubini A, et al. A polyphenol-rich dietary pattern improves intestinal permeability, evaluated as serum zonulin levels, in older subjects: the MaPLE randomised controlled trial[J]. Clinical Nutrition, 2021, 40(5): 3006-3018.
[42] Peron G, Mero
o T, Gargari G, et al. A polyphenol-rich diet increases the gut microbiota metabolite indole 3-propionic acid in older adults with preserved kidney function[J]. Molecular Nutrition &Food Research, 2022, 66(21): e2100349.
[43] Vázquez-Lorente H, Hernández-Cacho A, García-Gavilán J F, et al. Inflammatory dietary potential and gut microbiota in older adults with overweight or obesity and metabolic syndrome[J]. Food Research Internatio-nal, 2025, 221: 117263.
[44] Klümpen L, Mantri A, Donkers A, et al. Calorie-restricted oat diet is associated with zonulin and short-chain fatty acid response in metabolic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Gut Microbes, 2026, 18(1): 2662687.
[45] Cicero A F G, Fogacci F, Bove M, et al. Impact of a short-term synbiotic supplementation on metabolic syndrome and systemic inflammation in elderly patients: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial[J]. European Journal of Nutrition, 2021, 60(2): 655-663.
[46] Kim C S, Jung M H, Choi E Y, et al. Probiotic supplementation has sex-dependent effects on immune responses in association with the gut microbiota in community-dwelling older adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial[J]. Nutrition Research and Practice, 2023, 17(5): 883-898.
[47] Suenaert P, Segers A, Rymenans L, et al. Effect of pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila MucT on insulin sensitivity, body composition, and GLP-1 production in subjects with metabolic syndrome: impact of low baseline gut Akkermansia levels[J]. Gut Microbes, 2026, 18(1): 2690689.
[48] Elhassan Y S, Kluckova K, Fletcher R S, et al. Nicotinamide riboside augments the aged human skeletal muscle NAD+ metabolome and induces transcriptomic and anti-inflammatory signatures[J]. Cell Reports, 2019, 28(7): 1717-1728.
[49] Kumar P, Liu C, Suliburk J, et al. Supplementing glycine and N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) in older adults improves glutathione deficiency, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, physical function, and aging hallmarks: a randomized clinical trial[J]. The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2023, 78(1): 75-89.
[50] Liu S, D’Amico D, Shankland E, et al. Effect of urolithin a supplementation on muscle endurance and mitochondrial health in older adults: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Network Open, 2022, 5(1): e2144279.
[51] Dunning B J, Bourgonje A R, Bulthuis M L C, et al. Selenium and coenzyme Q10 improve the systemic redox status while reducing cardiovascular mortality in elderly population-based individuals[J]. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2023, 204: 207-214.
[52] Donath M Y, Shoelson S E. Type 2 diabetes as an inflammatory disease[J]. Nature Reviews Immunology, 2011, 11(2): 98-107.
[53] Hernando-Redondo J, Malcampo M, Pérez-Vega K A, et al. Mediterranean diet modulation of neuroinflammation-related genes in elderly adults at high cardiovascular risk[J]. Nutrients, 2024, 16(18): 3147.
[54] Koenig R T, Dickman J R, Kang C H, et al. Avenanthramide supplementation attenuates eccentric exercise-inflicted blood inflammatory markers in women[J]. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2016, 116(1): 67-76.
[55] García-Martínez B I, Ruiz-Ramos M, Pedraza-Chaverri J, et al. Effect of resveratrol on markers of oxidative stress and sirtuin 1 in elderly adults with type 2 diabetes[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(8): 7422.
[56] Rastgoo S, Pourvali K, Raeissadat S A, et al. Co-administration of vitamin D and N-acetylcysteine to modulate immunosenescence in older adults with vitamin D deficiency: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Frontiers in Immunology, 2025, 16: 1570441.
[57] Dalle S, Van Roie E, Hiroux C, et al. Omega-3 supplementation improves isometric strength but not muscle anabolic and catabolic signaling in response to resistance exercise in healthy older adults[J]. The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2021, 76(3): 406-414.
[58] Broome S C, Whitfield J, Janssens K, et al. MitoQ supplementation does not impact redox responses to acute exercise in skeletal muscle of older individuals[J]. Redox Biology, 2025, 88: 103927.
[59] Rodriguez D J, Ostrom E L, Chassman C, et al. Sulforaphane improves exercise-induced NRF2 signaling in older adults: an in vivo-ex vivo approach[J]. GeroScience, 2026, 48(2): 2085-2100.
[60] Serhan C N, Levy B D. Resolvins in inflammation: emergence of the pro-resolving superfamily of mediators[J]. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2018, 128(7): 2657-2669.
[61] Markworth J F, Brown L A, Lim E, et al. Metabolipi-domic profiling reveals an age-related deficiency of ske-letal muscle pro-resolving mediators that contributes to maladaptive tissue remodeling[J]. Aging Cell, 2021, 20(6): e13393.
[62] Smith G I, Atherton P, Reeds D N, et al. Dietary omega-3 fatty acid supplementation increases the rate of muscle protein synthesis in older adults: a randomized controlled trial[J]. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2011, 93(2): 402-412.
[63] Smith G I, Julliand S, Reeds D N, et al. Fish oil-derived n-3 PUFA therapy increases muscle mass and function in healthy older adults 1[J]. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2015, 102(1): 115-122.
[64] Liberman K, Njemini R, Luiking Y, et al. Thirteen weeks of supplementation of vitamin D and leucine-enriched whey protein nutritional supplement attenuates chronic low-grade inflammation in sarcopenic older adults: the PROVIDE study[J]. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2019, 31(6): 845-854.
[65] Pereira S L, Shoemaker M E, Gawel S, et al. Biomar-ker changes in response to a 12-week supplementation of an oral nutritional supplement enriched with protein, vitamin D and HMB in malnourished community dwelling older adults with sarcopenia[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(6): 1196.
[66] Murphy C H, Flanagan E M, de Vito G, et al. Does supplementation with leucine-enriched protein alone and in combination with fish-oil-derived n-3 PUFA affect muscle mass, strength, physical performance, and muscle protein synthesis in well-nourished older adults A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2021, 113(6): 1411-1427.
[67] Cai X X, Yu H L, Liu L, et al. Milk powder co-supplemented with inulin and resistant dextrin improves glycemic control and insulin resistance in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Molecular Nutrition &Food Research, 2018, 62(24): e1800865.
[68] Yoshida K, Kokubo E, Morita S, et al. Combination of inulin and resistant dextrin has superior prebiotic effects and reduces gas production during in vitro fermentation of fecal samples from older people[J]. Nutrients, 2024, 16(24): 4262.
[69] Shivakoti R, Biggs M L, Djoussé L, et al. Intake and sources of dietary fiber, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease in older US adults[J]. JAMA Network Open, 2022, 5(3): e225012.
[70] Dalile B, la Torre D, Kalc P, et al. Extruded wheat bran consumption increases serum short-chain fatty acids but does not modulate psychobiological functions in healthy men: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2022, 9: 896154.
[71] Ganda M J P, Fart F, Sabet J A, et al. Effects of die-tary fibres on acute indomethacin-induced intestinal hyperpermeability in the elderly: a randomised placebo controlled parallel clinical trial[J]. Nutrients, 2020, 12(7): 1954.
[72] King D E, Mainous A G 3rd, Egan B M, et al. Effect of psyllium fiber supplementation on C-reactive protein: the trial to reduce inflammatory markers (TRIM)[J]. Annals of Family Medicine, 2008, 6(2): 100-106.
[73] Rondanelli M, Klersy C, Terracol G, et al. Whey protein, amino acids, and vitamin D supplementation with physical activity increases fat-free mass and strength, functionality, and quality of life and decreases inflammation in sarcopenic elderly 1 2[J]. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2016, 103(3): 830-840.
[74] Chanet A, Verlaan S, Salles J, et al. Supplementing breakfast with a vitamin D and leucine-enriched whey protein medical nutrition drink enhances postprandial muscle protein synthesis and muscle mass in healthy older men[J]. The Journal of Nutrition, 2017, 147(12): 2262-2271.
[75] Casperson S L, Sheffield-Moore M, Hewlings S J, et al. Leucine supplementation chronically improves muscle protein synthesis in older adults consuming the RDA for protein[J]. Clinical Nutrition, 2012, 31(4): 512-519.
[76] Markova M, Koelman L, Hornemann S, et al. Effects of plant and animal high protein diets on immune-inflammatory biomarkers: a 6-week intervention trial[J]. Clinical Nutrition, 2020, 39(3): 862-869.
[77] Lépine G, Davila A M, Cueff G, et al. Increasing plant protein sources in the diet modulates gut microbiota and tryptophan metabolism in men at cardiometabolic risk[J]. Gut Microbes, 2026, 18(1): 2677951.
[78] Kiecolt-Glaser J K, Belury M A, Andridge R, et al. Omega-3 supplementation lowers inflammation in healthy middle-aged and older adults: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 2012, 26(6): 988-995.
[79] So J, Wu D Y, Lichtenstein A H, et al. EPA and DHA differentially modulate monocyte inflammatory response in subjects with chronic inflammation in part via plasma specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study[J]. Atherosclerosis, 2021, 316: 90-98.
[80] Martucci M, Conte M, Bucci L, et al. Twelve-week daily consumption of ad hoc fortified milk with ω-3, D, and group B vitamins has a positive impact on inflammaging parameters: a randomized cross-over trial[J]. Nutrients, 2020, 12(11): 3580.
[81] Golpour P, Nourbakhsh M, Mazaherioun M, et al. Improvement of NRF2 gene expression and antioxidant status in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial[J]. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2020, 162: 108120.
[82] Borda M G, Ramírez-Vélez R, Botero-Rodriguez F, et al. Anthocyanin supplementation in adults at risk for dementia: a randomized controlled trial on its cardiometabolic and anti-inflammatory biomarker effects[J]. GeroScience, 2026, 48(1): 563-576.
[83] Groh I A M, Bakuradze T, Pahlke G, et al. Consumption of anthocyanin-rich beverages affects Nrf2 and Nrf2-dependent gene transcription in peripheral lymphocytes and DNA integrity of healthy volunteers[J]. BMC Chemistry, 2020, 14(1): 39.
[84] Mury P, Dagher O, Fortier A, et al. Quercetin reduces vascular senescence and inflammation in symptomatic male but not female coronary artery disease patients[J]. Aging Cell, 2025, 24(8): e70108.
[85] Li S D, Hamaya R, Zhu H D, et al. Effects of 2-year cocoa extract supplementation on inflammaging biomar-kers in older US adults: findings from the cocoa supplement and multivitamin outcomes study randomised clinical trial[J]. Age and Ageing, 2025, 54(9): afaf269.
[86] Ismaeel A, McDermott M M, Joshi J K, et al. Cocoa flavanols, Nrf2 activation, and oxidative stress in peripheral artery disease: mechanistic findings in muscle based on outcomes from a randomized trial[J]. American Journal of Physiology Cell Physiology, 2024, 326(2): C589-C605.
[87] Andrade I, Santos L, Ramos F. “Add-on” effect of phytosterols-enriched fermented milk on lipids and markers of cholesterol metabolism in statin-treated elderly patients[J]. Steroids, 2015, 99: 293-298.
[88] Amiot M J, Knol D, Cardinault N, et al. Comparable reduction in cholesterol absorption after two different ways of phytosterol administration in humans[J]. European Journal of Nutrition, 2013, 52(3): 1215-1222.
[89] Li Z H, Fan X Z, Gao F, et al. Fructose metabolism and its roles in metabolic diseases, inflammatory diseases, and cancer[J]. Molecular Biomedicine, 2025, 6(1): 43.
[90] Cozma A I, Sievenpiper J L, de Souza R J, et al. Effect of fructose on glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials[J]. Diabetes Care, 2012, 35(7): 1611-1620.
[91] Chiu S, Mulligan K, Schwarz J M. Dietary carbohydrates and fatty liver disease: de novo lipogenesis[J]. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 2018, 21(4): 277-282.
[92] Spruss A, Kanuri G, Wagnerberger S, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 is involved in the development of fructose-induced hepatic steatosis in mice[J]. Hepatology, 2009, 50(4): 1094-1104.
[93] Milesi G, Rangan A, Grafenauer S. Whole grain consumption and inflammatory markers: a systematic literature review of randomized control trials[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(2): 374.
[94] Salehi-Abargouei A, Saraf-Bank S, Bellissimo N, et al. Effects of non-soy legume consumption on C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Nutrition, 2015, 31(5): 631-639.
[95] Koh A, De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, et al. From dietary fiber to host physiology: short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites[J]. Cell, 2016, 165(6): 1332-1345.
[96] Bauer J, Biolo G, Cederholm T, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE study group[J]. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2013, 14(8): 542-559.
[97] Wang X Y, Yang Z Y, Zhang W G, et al. Obstacles, research progress, and prospects of oral delivery of bioactive peptides: a comprehensive review[J]. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2024, 11: 1496706.
[98] Patted P G, Masareddy R S, Patil A S, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids: a comprehensive scientific review of their sources, functions and health benefits[J]. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2024, 10(1): 94.
[99] Tan A L, Sullenbarger B, Prakash R, et al. Supplementation with eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid reduces high levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines in aging adults: a randomized, controlled study[J]. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, 2018, 132: 23-29.
[100] Ras R T, Geleijnse J M, Trautwein E A. LDL-cholesterol-lowering effect of plant sterols and stanols across different dose ranges: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies[J]. The British Journal of Nutrition, 2014, 112(2): 214-219.
[101] Zou X Y, Xu T, Zhao T, et al. Phytosterol organic acid esters: characterization, anti-inflammatory properties and a delivery strategy to improve mitochondrial function[J]. Current Research in Food Science, 2024, 8: 100702.
[102] Tundis R, Augimeri G, Vivacqua A, et al. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of leaves and sheath from bamboo (Phyllostacys edulis J. houz)[J]. Antioxidants, 2023, 12(6): 1239.
[103] Shen X Y, Huang W C, Zhan S N, et al. Bamboo leaf flavonoids counteract lipopolysaccharide-induced gut dysfunction in aging laying hens through microbiota and metabolic reprogramming[J]. Poultry Science, 2026, 105(2): 106328.
[104] Marino M, Del Bo’ C, Martini D, et al. A (poly)phenol-rich diet reduces serum and faecal calprotectin in older adults with increased intestinal permeability: the MaPLE randomised controlled trial[J]. BMC Geria-trics, 2024, 24(1): 707.
[105] Jia H B, Jia Y Q, Ren F Y, et al. Enhancing bioactive compounds in plant-based foods: influencing factors and technological advances[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 460: 140744.
[106] Yang B W, Lu B Y, Zhao Y J, et al. Formation of phytosterol photooxidation products: a chemical reaction mechanism for light-induced oxidation[J]. Food Chemistry, 2020, 333: 127430.
[107] Cao H, Saroglu O, Karadag A, et al. Available technologies on improving the stability of polyphenols in food processing[J]. Food Frontiers, 2021, 2(2): 109-139.
[108] Wang B J, Lv Y J, Yang S M, et al. Critical review of food colloidal delivery system for bioactive compounds: physical characterization and application[J]. Foods, 2024, 13(16): 2596.
[109] He W S, Zhu H Y, Chen Z Y. Plant sterols: chemical and enzymatic structural modifications and effects on their cholesterol-lowering activity[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(12): 3047-3062.
[110] Yang B W, Ji S Y, Zhao T, et al. Phytosterols photooxidation in O/W emulsion: Influence of emulsifier composition and interfacial properties[J]. Food Hydrocolloids, 2023, 142: 108698.
[111] Zhao T, Yang B W, Ji S Y, et al. Effects of the structure and interaction force of phytosterol/whey protein isolate self-assembly complex on phytosterol digestion properties[J]. Food Chemistry, 2023, 403: 134311.
[112] Li H M, Tan X J, Huang W J, et al. Enzymatic acylation of flavonoids from bamboo leaves: improved lipophilicity and antioxidant activity for oil-based foods[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2023, 71(12): 4817-4824.
[113] Rémond D, Shahar D R, Gille D, et al. Understan-ding the gastrointestinal tract of the elderly to develop dietary solutions that prevent malnutrition[J]. Oncotarget, 2015, 6(16): 13858-13898.
[114] de Castro Cogle K, Kubo M T K, Merlier F, et al. Probabilistic modelling of the food matrix effects on curcuminoid’s in vitro oral bioaccessibility[J]. Foods, 2024, 13(14): 2234.
[115] Li X J, You Y M, Wu L R, et al. Rheological properties, multiscale structure, and in vitro digestibility of a maize starch-konjac glucomannan-bamboo leaf flavonoid complex modified by dynamic high-pressure microfluidi-zation[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 457: 139966.
[116] Zhou Z J, Li Y, Xu M H, et al. Pullulanase-assisted bamboo leaf flavonoids optimize the instant properties, in vitro digestibility, and underlying mechanism in yam flour[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 460: 140467.
Lu Baiyi, Liu Xuanzhuo, Wang Zhangtie. Early nutritional interventions for metabolic inflammation in older adults and development of functional ingredients for age-friendly foods [J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2026,44(4):20-36.
X